Closed Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Prot Warriors versus Paladins

  1. #1

    Prot Warriors versus Paladins

    First and foremost let me apologize to the moderators and other posters of this subject was recently discussed. I want to discuss this seemingly ongoing issue that I'm sure many other protection warriors like myself encounter.

    Very recently I was passed over in an ICC 25-man pug for a paladin. Now, upon asking the raid leader why he preferred a paladin (mind you, I'm 3/4 T 10.5 gear), I was told "because paladins have AOE." Now I'm not doing an emo rant because I didn't go and yes, I understand its the discretion of the raid leader who he or she wants to invite to their raid but the logic this person used was astounding.

    By the way, the two other tanks were a druid and death knight. Now I'm sure besides his faulty logic on inviting the paladin, I'm sure there are an infinite number of reasons why he preferred a paladin over a warrior. What I want to know is why is there this bias of paladins over warriors? I mean balancing out your raid classes is one thing but to prefer something simply because of their special ability is another. I know blizzard made pros and cons in every class but I'm starting to think if paladins are better (overall) than warriors. Anyone else (especially warriors) encountering this problem?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22
    we can compete with druids and dks but when it comes to prot paladins we're outmatched.

    sounds like a fail pug, I mean with 3 tanks, warr, dk, druid you dont worry about aoe. there's 3 damn tanks.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    122
    My son, let me point you in the right direction:

    Here

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    102
    Maybe there were few paladins in the raid and the raid leader wanted more buffs?
    "We have two ears and one mouth for a reason." - Buddhist belief.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    198
    In all honesty, you got the better end of the deal. Raid leader sounds like a mouthbreather so it probably would've been a wipefest anyway.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    127
    Prot warriors simply take more skill to play than a pally. The 96969 rotation could be done by a chimp without fail. This being said a lot of people have encountered too many fail warriors that if they get a pull that's larger than 1, dps will pull threat and die. However, with a druid and a DK it would be fine since both of them could handle any aoe situations just fine. Like you said however, it is up to the RL's discretion as to what type of tanks to have and if he wanted more AoE a pally would be perfectly suited for it. Gretchin also makes a valid point in saying perhaps they had a lack of paladins in general and wanted more buffs.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the cloud.
    Posts
    2,266
    Quote Originally Posted by crashxdjp View Post
    we can compete with druids and dks but when it comes to prot paladins i'm outmatched..
    Fixt, speak for yourself.

    Yes, the raid leader's a tool for not knowing your personal capability and taking the class that's easily reliable for AOE. I wouldn't give much thought to it. Just find another pug. Anyway, IBTL.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tengenstein View Post
    just don't let them melee you up the bum.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    3,523
    You know how I know you didn't read Posting & Chat Rules?
    Got a question? Try here: Evil Empire Guides and here: Tankspot Guides and Articles Library first!

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts