1. New Registrant
Join Date
Jan 2010
Posts
1

## Tanking optimization

Has anyone wrote any code to find the optimal balance(given a set of constraints) for stam, def, avoidance, etc...?

What I'm suggesting is for someone to write an algorithm that tries various combination of gems, enchants, and possibly other things(gear, buffs, etc...) to maximize survivability or other such things.

The idea is that given a set of parameters such as hps, boss_dps, spike damage, etc... one can somewhat easily find a maximium set of parameters that will maximize survivability.

For example, assuming gems only with no socket bonus for plate tanks(stam + def), one has

loss_hpps = hps - boss_dps.

boss_dps is modified by avoidance and block. We can see here that stam gems are useless for this if boss_dps is average. Hence stam gems only provide a buffer for healers to heal you or for spike damage.

e.g., Suppose you have 30k hp and your fighting a boss that every once in a while does 29k unmitigated damage to you, the tank, and does 90% damage to each person in the raid. In a situation like this it would be wise to have more hp to allow the healers to heal the raid. If you had 60k hp then it might not be an issue for the spike damage since the healers can easily heal up the raid without worrying about the tank.

OTOH, if you can survive all spike damage well then the extra def will increase survivability mitigating most damage. In the example above, if you have 30k hp but the 29k is mitigated to 10k because of the high def then you effectively have about 90k health. (just an example, obvious stam stacking will have some mitigation too)

So the idea is to find the effective health one has. Stam stacking is easy as that just adds to the base hp. Def stacking is more complex because of diminishing returns(hence there is a point when adding def is worthless and the idea is to find that point(which depends on how much stam you can add)).

It's obvious that not all scenarios are identical and in some cases one would want stam stacking while others one wants def. In the above example if the damage is unmitigated and it is now 35k then 30k hp is not enough no matter how much def you have and you must increase your hp by at least 5k for any chance of survivability.

So a basic algorithm for finding the best gems given a set of conditions(such as boss damage, spike damage, hps, etc..) would be quite easy to implement. I'm not quite sure how effectively it would be without decent approximations to different scenarios. One, of course, could mine the data needed by monitoring boss encounters.

In any case if anyone is interested in discussing and potentially developing a useful addon/algorithm feel free to comment. Maybe eventually I'll have the time to explore this more. Obviously it is a very complex issue because of all the variables involved but it should not be difficult to get some approximation to maximizing survivability for most encounters.

(and a similar procedure could be used for healing and dps)

2. New Registrant
Join Date
Jan 2009
Posts
24
Rawr doesnt work for you?

Rawr

3. It sounds to me like you're talking about Effective Health and Time to Live, but adding in avoidance. In general, we don't like to keep avoidance in these calculations, because the situations that will kill a tank are often situations where avoidance fails. Even if you have 60+% avoidance, you're still quite likely to take 3+ hits in a row at some point during an encounter. Given that, Effective Health and Time to Live calculations generally assume you are being hit on every swing.

Maintankadin &bull; View topic - "Total" EH - incorporating different damage types into EH

Tanking Spreadsheet 3.3 - Elitist Jerks

5. UI Creator | Warrior Tank
Join Date
Oct 2007
Location
Illinois
Posts
1,632
Originally Posted by Reev
It sounds to me like you're talking about Effective Health and Time to Live, but adding in avoidance. In general, we don't like to keep avoidance in these calculations, because the situations that will kill a tank are often situations where avoidance fails. Even if you have 60+% avoidance, you're still quite likely to take 3+ hits in a row at some point during an encounter. Given that, Effective Health and Time to Live calculations generally assume you are being hit on every swing.
Your exactly right Avoidance cannot be factored in because its random or RNG, you can never count on it being there for you at the exact time you need it.

6. Originally Posted by Bodasafa
Your exactly right Avoidance cannot be factored in because its random or RNG, you can never count on it being there for you at the exact time you need it.
RNG can be factored in over a long enough timetable. The problem is that the 2-3 swings it takes to kill a tank aren't a long enough timetable.

If tank health were much larger compared to the size of mob swings, avoidance would be a legitimate stat to examine in time to live calculations. RNG isn't always irrelevant. It just doesn't make sense to look at in today's world of tanking.