My point was more that your example didn't really show the reasoning behind the discussion on it (since the example fell within the bounds of the desired end state before a change was enacted), so I was trying to find out what the driving force is for the change so I could better understand where it was coming from. It's hard to comment on something if you don't know what you are really commenting on. If it was the fact that the higher scaling is scary and could lead to problems down the road, then that could be looked at. If it was that the health levels should be much closer than 3%, then that too could be looked at. If there was some other objective, that could be looked at too. I am just trying to understand. But I do agree with you in that paladins and warriors are pretty close already and are definitely in a similar boat.
By the way, I thought the opening post on the whole was a very good post. I like looking at issues like these because they are important.
I think my discussion with you might actually drive the conversation away from the points I believe you are making. I guess the thing I wanted you to take away from this was I wasn't trying to accuse you of wanting to nerf us. I am simply a details person and got to curious. Perhaps I will ask you at a more appropriate time than this topic, since this discussion doesn't really go into the large EH differences and is more a of curiosity on my part. But in either case, I don't think you are trying to get us nerfed by any means, I am just OCD is all . I don't want this post to derail a good topic, though, so sorry about that.