I have been reading these arguments over and over and you are starting to frustrate me.
I don't really want to argue with you Bovinity but if you are talking about theorycraft, you can't really go 'Oh well this statement is not true or justified by the logic used, however, if we just change what the words mean and say it's about semantics, it's correct'. That's the nature of scrutinising mathematical theory or logic which is what is being used in this thread. Any false statement could be argued to be true if you change the meaning of the words.
I'm sorry but at the end of the day, only one person in the thread seems to understand the flaw in the logic you have used, perhaps it is too subtle. I don't really want to continue it via pm because I can't see the point if you don't understand it, you don't understand