No more SS>Revenge>Devastate weaved with shockwave - Page 2 - TankSpot
Remove Advertisements
No more SS>Revenge>Devastate weaved with shockwave
TankSpot // TankSpot News & Discussion // Theory & Mechanics Discussion
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 09-27-2009, 01:18 PM
orcstar's Avatar
Kind of a warrior.
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 970
Blog Entries: 5
Without shieldslam you won't activate your glyph of blocking and lose a bit damage reduction.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-27-2009, 05:02 PM
Tauren Rogue
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 261
I don't use Glyph of Blocking anymore, in my mitigation setup I use Last Stand, Shield Wall and Devastate, exactly for the purposes of reducing the amount of focus my threat needs in order to increase the available focus I can put on survival (using CDs, interrupt, even picking up new adds, ...)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-30-2009, 10:17 PM
Established Registrant
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 105
That's fine, just ignore me. Its cool. Ill just walk away... walking... Ill be back!
__________________
Dynamic
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-01-2009, 05:59 AM
Tauren Rogue
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 261
Source: SquishemHard
That's fine, just ignore me. Its cool. Ill just walk away... walking... Ill be back!
Try this thing. It has Rend, it has weapon speed, it has my awesome name on it
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-01-2009, 06:23 AM
Jayde on EJ
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 501
I still quite strongly disagree with the suggestion of just spamming Devastate that some people are drawing.

I don't believe the numbers support it unless you have both 2-set bonuses and honestly it is simply not that hard to do a SS > Devastate (> Devastate > CB/SW/Devastate) priority and it will, in almost every case, increase either your TPS, your DPS, or both.

Just spamming Devastate strikes me as a little lazy and given that there is absolutely no reason to assume that the T10 set bonuses will be similar, there seems little reason to slip into the habit of a sub-standard rotation.

It's worth keeping in mind that the T8 set bonus was designed well before Devastate was buffed, hense its abnormally high value post-3.2. I would not expect such a strong bias toward Devastate in the future.

Although it's quite possible that Devastate spam can be 'passable' TPS in some situations, I'm doubtful that it will remain a long-term option nor does it appear to really be the best optimization of one's raid DPS contribution in the majority of cases.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-01-2009, 10:02 AM
Sponsor
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 574
Is that the conclusion that is being drawn? What I took from this thread was that Revenge has fallen by the wayside as far as TPS goes and is there only as an option to max DPS. On that basis, I dropped improved revenge and have started to leave it out of my cycle except when rage income is low.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-12-2009, 06:09 AM
Jayde on EJ
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 501
As a note to this, the future T10 set bonus makes it extremely clear that a 'proper' rotation--with at least full use of SW, Shield Slam, and CB--is likely the way forward and getting into the habit of Devastate spamming won't do you too many favors over the long-term.

The 20% damage bonus is absolutely amazing for TPS and DPS increases when using a SS > Dev > Dev > SW/CB/Dev rotation. It far outclasses the DPS and TPS bonuses from our previous 2-sets.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-19-2009, 12:40 AM
Established Registrant
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 105
I'm interested in the logic that 20% SW/SS dmg translates to using CB. Even before the set buffs, SW creeps ahead only because it can't be avoided, but CB can and gains no set bonus buff, and still can't trigger SnB.
__________________
Dynamic
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-19-2009, 05:22 AM
Jayde on EJ
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 501
Source: SquishemHard
I'm interested in the logic that 20% SW/SS dmg translates to using CB. Even before the set buffs, SW creeps ahead only because it can't be avoided, but CB can and gains no set bonus buff, and still can't trigger SnB.
Because the loss of potential double Devastate set bonuses results in CB dealing more damage than Devastate under almost every possible condition--especially considering it scales better.

The SnB issue is irrelevant since you always want to use the filler abilities on the last ability in a cycle--thus SnB is only a rage gain at that point and not a TPS gain. (You can trigger it, but Shield Slam will already be off cooldown by the end of your GCD either way, thus nothing is really gained other than the Shield Slam being free.)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-19-2009, 05:37 AM
Grumpy Old Man
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 178
Thanks for the work on this Kojiyama.
Been following this thread intently as I am at the point where I need to start making some gear decisions. IE: Loosing my 2pc 8/9
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


World of Warcraft™ and Blizzard Entertainment® are all trademarks or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment in the United States and/or other countries. These terms and all related materials, logos, and images are copyright © Blizzard Entertainment. This site is in no way associated with or endorsed by Blizzard Entertainment®.