3.2 Threat Values (Devastate) - Page 3 - TankSpot
Remove Advertisements
3.2 Threat Values (Devastate)
TankSpot // TankSpot News & Discussion // Theory & Mechanics Discussion
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #41  
Old 09-28-2009, 12:18 PM
Kazeyonoma's Avatar
t3h Banhammer
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 9,583
Blog Entries: 2
my mistake.
__________________

READ THIS: Posting & Chat Rules
Source: Turelliax
I will never be a kaz.. no one can reach the utter awesomeness of you.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-01-2009, 01:34 AM
Lurker
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Before we get too excited and start reworking priority rotations to drop CB/SW, there seems to be a fairly constraining set of circumstances in which Devastate is wholly worthwhile to use in place of CB/SW. This is to be expected, as CB/SW scale, much, much more strongly with AP than Devastate does. Let's examine some assumptions quickly:

1) At lower AP levels (say, before 3400 AP, raid buffed), Devastate is almost always better for threat than CB/SW because of the bonus damage it gets from doing weapon damage plus bonus damage based on sunder armor stacks.

2) Devastate needs a lot of support to be sufficiently propped up. Near as I can tell, there are five ways to buff Devastate's threat:

-2 piece T8 (+crit chance)
-2 piece T9 (+damage)
-Glyph (double bonus threat)
-Use a higher DPS weapon
-Use a slower swinging weapon

Using a Cudgel of the Damned as a tanking weapon, in addition to getting you kicked in the face by your melee DPS, is not by itself sufficient to boost Devastate above either CB or SW in damage OR threat. Likewise, using the Glyph of Devastate by itself will not boost Devastate above the other two skills while using a lower DPS, faster tanking weapon like the Peacekeeper Blade. All these assumptions are drawn from my personal (meager) Warrior using Wartotem's Spreadsheet. Your mileage will vary.

3) When you reach a certain threshold of AP (eg. you're in a threat oriented gearset with a proc trinket that gives AP, a la Mirror of Truth), CB/SW are going to flat out win no matter what your weapon speed or set bonuses are. Because SW can't be parried, it will take a lower threshold of AP for SW to match Devastate's threat than it would take for CB. For me, using the "best case Devastate scenario" of 2 piece T8, 2 piece T9, Glyph of Devastate, with a Cudgel of the Damned, the threshold was ~6800 AP raid buffed for SW and ~8200 AP raid buffed for CB.

I'm not a big numbers guy, so I'm sure a lot of this is "well duh," information ("Why yes Wyuli, SW DOES scale better than Devastate. Here's a cookie"). I do think it is important, however, to make sure the right conditions are present for dropping CB/SW to be a good idea in an individual's threat rotation (and so we can avoid a lot of, "But I read on Tankspot that using Devastate instead of CB/SW was always a good idea...." discussions).

Last edited by Wyuli; 10-01-2009 at 01:41 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-01-2009, 05:56 AM
Tauren Rogue
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 261
I support Wyuli's statement. I originally made the spreadsheet to find out exactly where/when those turning points in threat occured and after a lot of fidlling around with it, I can tell you that there is no optimal all-round rotation.
Most of the skills are close enough together to not matter much, but if you really want to max either DPS or TPS, you'll need to find your own rotation depending on your gear & buffs.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


World of Warcraft™ and Blizzard Entertainment® are all trademarks or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment in the United States and/or other countries. These terms and all related materials, logos, and images are copyright © Blizzard Entertainment. This site is in no way associated with or endorsed by Blizzard Entertainment®.