#1  
Old 11-15-2007, 10:43 PM
Ciderhelm's Avatar
TankSpot Administrator
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tacoma, Wa
Posts: 5,569
Blog Entries: 69
New Initial Threat Rotation?

Scenario
You have 5+ Devastate, 2x Shield Slam and 2x Revenge. Organize these to provide maximum Threat output, keeping in mind that:
  • Each of the first 5 Devastates will provide a Sunder Armor debuff and increase the damage of Shield Slam and Revenge;
  • Normal attacks will see a damage increase withthe Sunder Armor debuff if Devastates are applied sooner;
  • Devastate is assumed to be 9 rage, Shield Slam is assumed to be 17 rage, and Revenge is assumed to be 2 rage;
  • Devastate has significantly increased Threat for the first five applications.
Is initial threat increased by prioritizing Devastate over other abilities?
__________________

TankSpot.com | EventideGuild.com | WoWArmory
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2007, 10:59 PM
Satrina's Avatar
village idiot
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canadia
Posts: 1,110
Blog Entries: 7
When we did Leo yesterday, I changed it up at the start of each phase between:
- Shield Slam, Revenge, Devastate...
- Shield Slam, Devastate, Revenge...
- Shield Slam, Devastate, Devastate...
- Devastate, Devastate, Shield Slam...
- Devastate, Revenge, Devastate...
- Devastate, Revenge, Shield Slam...

DPS came in without delay at the same time I did, never was in any danger of losing aggro even with an enhancement shaman. I can't say as there was any practical difference between them that I could notice.

I'm hopped on painkillers right now, so I won't be trying any mathcraft to figure out the theoretical best cycle just now I'm sure Lavina already has it done anwyay.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:10 AM
thugthedum's Avatar
Warrior Tank
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 213
Blog Entries: 59
Send a message via Yahoo to thugthedum
I'm still struggling with meat memory problems. I catch myself sundering more often than I care to admit.

It's getting better, of course.
__________________
Melissa Theuriau is not a marmot.
Armory
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2007, 06:38 AM
Casual Tank
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 124
Blog Entries: 11
I had troubles last night in a Heroic SP pug w/ the healer grabbing agro often. My rotation is SS, Rev, Dev, Dev, repeat...

I dont know if it was my weapon or something else, but it was very rough...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2007, 07:13 AM
Here is the beef
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 222
Definitely starting with Devastate until SA is stacked 5 times, probably a Revenge in between if it lights up. It is easily good enough to hold initial aggro in 2.3 and you want the debuff up as soon as possible anyways. Devastate is also much better threat per rage than Shield Slam while you are still stacking SA, which will help at the beginning of an encounter when you might not have much rage to go around.

On threat wipes like Leo, Supremus etc where SA is already stacked five times, opening with Shield Slam is still best of course.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2007, 09:48 AM
A real Nub.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 224
Not entirely related to initial threat, but if starting with Devastate is remotely close (gg if it is better) than starting with ss, the value of improved bloodrage is greatly decreased on the opening pull.
__________________
http://sigs.guildlaunch.net/wsig.php/2088262zgMXW.png
The beast is getting hungrier.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2007, 11:15 AM
veneretio's Avatar
Tank Strong and Prosper
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,085
Blog Entries: 51
Well for me I've found that I'm only using Revenge in Low Rage fights now. Otherwise it's open with Shield Slam and then just Devastate like crazy. This change definitely has put all of the old rotations out of wack.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:00 PM
Sangi's Avatar
noob
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 176
Theorycraft

Ok Im bored on lunch I'll play with the math. I will add up a few rotations and see what we get. I will assume my stats which is a shield slam damage of 400, base devastate weapon damage of 100, a normal hit for 200 and a revenge for 300. Rage costs assumed at SS of 17, Dev at 9, SA at 9, Rev at 2 and HS at 12.

Code:
Known threat values:
Devastate ___________________________   119/134/148/162/176 (see below)
Heroic Strike _______________________   196
Revenge _____________________________   200
Shield Slam _________________________   307
Sunder Armor ________________________   301

Calculated threat before talents
Devestate ___________________________   520/570/614/663/714 
Heroic Strike _______________________   396
Revenge _____________________________   500 
Shield Slam _________________________   707
Sunder Armor ________________________   301
Old rotations
SS, Rev, SA, SA, 4 normal attacks = 707 + 500 + 301 + 301 + (4 * 200) = 2609 @ 37 rage in 6 seconds

SS, Rev, SA, SA, HS, 3 normal attacks = 707 + 500 + 301 + 301 + 396 + (3 * 200) = 2805 @ 49 rage in 6 seconds

New Rotations
SS, Rev, Dev, Dev, 4 normal attacks = 707 + 500 + 520 + 570 + (4 * 200) = 3009 @ 37 rage in 6 seconds

SS, Dev, Dev, Dev, 4 normal attacks = 707 + 520 + 570 + 614 + (4 * 200) =
3211 @ 44 rage in 6 seconds

Dev, Dev, Dev, Dev 4 normal attacks = 520 + 570 + 614 + 663 + (4 * 200) =
2367 @ 36 rage in 6 seconds

So the winner looks to be SS 3xDev but is pretty expensive ragewise. Followed by good ole SS, Rev, 2x Dev. 4x Dev looks to be much lower threatwise. But again this is all theory crafting.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:16 PM
Registrant
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 40
I'd still say open with a shield slam for the big thump of threat it gives even if it's threat/rage is not as high. Some dpsers can be pretty crazy.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-16-2007, 04:07 PM
Nez's Avatar
Nez
Sponsor
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PDX
Posts: 328
Blog Entries: 4
Send a message via MSN to Nez
I tend to still open with shield slam mostly out of habit. >< I do seem to run our of rage more often now, I guess I need to lay off the HS a little. I think its really going to depend on what your tanking ( as always ) If it is a hard hitter, Go with the SS, dev spam would be my choice. Mobs seem to stick to us like glue now, the "new" devastate is a great tool.

Last edited by Nez; 11-16-2007 at 04:12 PM. Reason: clarification
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-16-2007, 05:18 PM
Sponsor
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles Area
Posts: 388
Your best bet is probably to do SS/Devx2/Revenge if you have a warrior OT helping you with sunders.

If you don't have an warrior OT, it's probably SS/Devx3/SS/Devx2/Revenge. I think it gives you reliable threat generation, as well as the most burst threat potential, which is critical for starting fights.
__________________
www.prevail-guild.com
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-16-2007, 05:55 PM
Ciderhelm's Avatar
TankSpot Administrator
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tacoma, Wa
Posts: 5,569
Blog Entries: 69
Source: Sangi
Ok Im bored on lunch I'll play with the math. I will add up a few rotations and see what we get. I will assume my stats which is a shield slam damage of 400, base devastate weapon damage of 100, a normal hit for 200 and a revenge for 300. Rage costs assumed at SS of 17, Dev at 9, SA at 9, Rev at 2 and HS at 12.

Code:
Known threat values:
Devastate ___________________________   119/134/148/162/176 (see below)
Heroic Strike _______________________   196
Revenge _____________________________   200
Shield Slam _________________________   307
Sunder Armor ________________________   301

Calculated threat before talents
Devestate ___________________________   520/570/614/663/714 
Heroic Strike _______________________   396
Revenge _____________________________   500 
Shield Slam _________________________   707
Sunder Armor ________________________   301
Old rotations
SS, Rev, SA, SA, 4 normal attacks = 707 + 500 + 301 + 301 + (4 * 200) = 2609 @ 37 rage in 6 seconds

SS, Rev, SA, SA, HS, 3 normal attacks = 707 + 500 + 301 + 301 + 396 + (3 * 200) = 2805 @ 49 rage in 6 seconds

New Rotations
SS, Rev, Dev, Dev, 4 normal attacks = 707 + 500 + 520 + 570 + (4 * 200) = 3009 @ 37 rage in 6 seconds

SS, Dev, Dev, Dev, 4 normal attacks = 707 + 520 + 570 + 614 + (4 * 200) =
3211 @ 44 rage in 6 seconds

Dev, Dev, Dev, Dev 4 normal attacks = 520 + 570 + 614 + 663 + (4 * 200) =
2367 @ 36 rage in 6 seconds

So the winner looks to be SS 3xDev but is pretty expensive ragewise. Followed by good ole SS, Rev, 2x Dev. 4x Dev looks to be much lower threatwise. But again this is all theory crafting.

Very nice, the numbers look solid. We'd want to expand on this to make sure that the reduction of Armor is being presented as additional damage/threat from normal attacks and shield slams.
__________________

TankSpot.com | EventideGuild.com | WoWArmory
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-16-2007, 07:24 PM
Kazeyonoma's Avatar
CM and Wall-O-Text'er
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,332
Blog Entries: 2
wait why is the devastate innate threat starting at 520?

301 + 119 = 420 not 520.
__________________
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-16-2007, 07:47 PM
Norrath's Avatar
Paladin, Warrior, Druid
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,348
Blog Entries: 8
Because it's not the innate threat he's talking about -- he's averaging Devastate hits to 100.

Though the total threat modifiers are still wrong... quick math says the following:

510 with 0 Sunders applied,
555 with 1 Sunder,
605 with 2 Sunders,
654 with 3 Sunders,
703 with 4 Sunders, and
451 with 5 Sunders.
__________________
ಠ_ಠ

Last edited by Norrath; 11-16-2007 at 07:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-16-2007, 08:24 PM
Here is the beef
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 222
Sangi, you forgot to include something like Dev, Dev, Rev, Dev. This is very vague anyways, the lower armor has quite an impact on threat generation (and of course helps raid DPS a bit).
Another good reason to open with Devastate is that you can save the 2 talent points for Improved Bloodrage.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-16-2007, 08:35 PM
Ciderhelm's Avatar
TankSpot Administrator
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tacoma, Wa
Posts: 5,569
Blog Entries: 69
I've updated the question in the original post. It is now as follows:


Scenario
You have 5+ Devastate, 2x Shield Slam and 2x Revenge. Organize these to provide maximum Threat output, keeping in mind that:
  • Each of the first 5 Devastates will provide a Sunder Armor debuff and increase the damage of Shield Slam and Revenge;
  • Normal attacks will see a damage increase withthe Sunder Armor debuff if Devastates are applied sooner;
  • Devastate is assumed to be 9 rage, Shield Slam is assumed to be 17 rage, and Revenge is assumed to be 2 rage;
  • Devastate has significantly increased Threat for the first five applications.
Is initial threat increased by prioritizing Devastate over other abilities?
__________________

TankSpot.com | EventideGuild.com | WoWArmory
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-16-2007, 09:02 PM
New Registrant
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada/Quebec
Posts: 3
Send a message via MSN to Felonys
Interesting thread.. this is also my first post so Hi

I would open with Shield Slam, Revenge (if it's up) Dev,dev,dev,SS, (revenge if up),dev,dev, then I guess into the fight i'd queue HS/Dev and proceed to the normal rotation.

It also bring me a question. I had a discussion today with out MT (I'm OT) about the usefullness of improve sunder armor. With the new devastate change do you think it's worth it ? Personally I don't think so and I'd like input on this topic.

(Tried the search fonction.. so I might be blind and if there's another thread maybe can someone post me the link to it ? thanks )
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-17-2007, 02:36 AM
Registrant
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 64
Imp SA means cheaper devastates, cheaper devastates allow you to have more rage for shield block in low rage situations and in high rage situations, more Heroic Strkes
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-17-2007, 08:17 AM
New Registrant
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 10
Another factor to consider is Expertise. A parried/dodged Shield Slam hurts your threat alot especially in the beginning.
My WWS-Miss stats got me thinking about this (with 21 Expertise):
Grohm - WWS
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-20-2007, 09:19 AM
veneretio's Avatar
Tank Strong and Prosper
WoW Characters
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,085
Blog Entries: 51
Source: Ciderhelm
I've updated the question in the original post. It is now as follows:


Scenario
You have 5+ Devastate, 2x Shield Slam and 2x Revenge. Organize these to provide maximum Threat output, keeping in mind that:
  • Each of the first 5 Devastates will provide a Sunder Armor debuff and increase the damage of Shield Slam and Revenge;
  • Normal attacks will see a damage increase withthe Sunder Armor debuff if Devastates are applied sooner;
  • Devastate is assumed to be 9 rage, Shield Slam is assumed to be 17 rage, and Revenge is assumed to be 2 rage;
  • Devastate has significantly increased Threat for the first five applications.
Is initial threat increased by prioritizing Devastate over other abilities?
That first hit will always need to be the highest possible threat making Shield Slam always the best opening. This way you have the highest buffer from healing aggro and trigger happy dps that start immediately.

My Vote
Bosses: SS > Devastate x5 > Normal Rotation.
Trash: SS whenever its up, Revenge > Devastate when it's not.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

World of Warcraft™ and Blizzard Entertainment® are all trademarks or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment in the United States and/or other countries. These terms and all related materials, logos, and images are copyright © Blizzard Entertainment. This site is in no way associated with or endorsed by Blizzard Entertainment®.