PDA

View Full Version : Infraction for Nicki: Whining



Lore
10-26-2008, 03:46 PM
Post: Paladin Ghostcrawler Responds to Paladin Nerfs (http://www.tankspot.com/forums/showthread.php?p=120066)
User: Nicki (http://www.tankspot.com/forums/member.php?u=609)
Infraction: Whining
Points: 1

Administrative Note:
Not helping


Message to User:
Nerfs or no, crying "time to go Warrior" and "Blizzard hates Paladins" isn't doing anyone any good. There are far more constructive ways to express your concerns.


Original Post:
JOTW shouldn't have been so late they had plenty of time heck they even buffed it during the ptr/beta so suddenly it becomes over powered and not balanced because ret should be the only class too run oom with JoW on the boss. My guess is they didn't want alot of boos at blizzcon.

We don't nerf due to public out cry and hybrids will do competitive dps now their buffs dont stack is aload of rubbish false hope to those who actually thought they could use their skill too out dps bad rogues. Merely take a look at elemental shaman damage output.

Time to go warrior!

Nicki
10-27-2008, 12:50 PM
1. The nerfs only made my choice to play and level my 70 warrior more realistic. My choice to say that i am rolling warrior is my choice.
2. I whined about blizzard's treatment of other class development for which i should recieve a infraction for.
3. I at no time tried to raise concerns i merely stated a fact that Jotw has been buffed twice in beta/ptr and it was easy very easy too see that ret in PvE would never go oom.
4. I whined about elemental shamans getting nothing from blizzard.
5. I was not crying I was stating that I am going warrior my post does not say blizzard hates paladins it says blizzard hates hybrids...

Notes: Infraction(s) should be given for:
1. Whining about blizzard's development
2. Making an assumption that blizzcon benefitted by not nerfing paladins before the event
3. Arguing with lore as too the infraction term given